top of page

Justice for Amiram!

For background information about the Kfar Duma case and insights from experts about the legality - or rather illegality - of torture, Honenu has gathered – click here – various articles and short videos. For more information about Honenu's representation of detainees in the case, click here.

Amiram Ben Uliel; Photo credit: Free use

Based solely on his confessions extracted by the GSS after interrogations under extreme duress, a euphemism for torture, Amiram Ben Uliel was sentenced to three life sentences plus 17 years' imprisonment following his conviction in the Kfar Duma arson case.


Ben Uliel is being held under extremely harsh prison conditions in Eshel Prison in southern Israel. He is in a high-security wing, in isolation, without any contact with other prisoners. He is allowed to leave his cell for only two hours a day, alone, to an empty, closed-in prison yard. Contrary to other prisoners, he is prohibited from phoning either his family or his attorneys. His family is allowed to visit him once every two weeks for approximately half an hour, separated by a glass partition. Additionally, he is not allowed to go to the prison synagogue to pray with a minyan, and he is allowed to keep only five holy books in his cell.


See below articles covering Honenu's representation of Amiram Ben Uliel. For the purpose of prayers, the name is Amiram ben Nurit.

"Thank you" to Justice for Amiram! campaign participants
Amiram Ben Uliel and his wife, Orian; Photo credit: Tomer Appelbaum/HaAretz/Pool
Screenshot, Malchut Ben Uliel; Courtesy of the family

June 22, 2021: Honenu launches podcast

September 5, 2018: The Kfar Duma trial continues

 
 
 

1 Comment


phylliskissel77
Jul 22, 2023

I was under the impression that in the Kfar Duma case, there was no one seen in the middle of the village who matched the description of Amiram ben Uliel, nor anyone who appeared even to be Jewish; in Arabic culture there is a strong revenge motive if there is an ongoing feud between tribes or families or groups; in light of all this, unless conclusively proven, and any admissions elicited under torture would not qualify as verified evidence, there is no good reason for holding Amiram, who is most likely an innocent man, and whose conviction is not without a reasonable doubt, the standard in cases involving arson, or any major crime.

Like
bottom of page